2025 Strategic Initiative Conference Survey
Overall Conference Feedback We made a point of building in more opportunities for interactivity this year. Did we get it right; how was it helpful? Should there be more, less, or a different approach?
Overall, what could have been better?
What should we consider incorporating to enhance the experience for first-time attendees?
For our colleagues who will host future conferences, do you have feedback on the hospitality, lodging, and/or logistics experience?
Session Feedback (1 of 9) |Session 1: The SI Landscape Today: Trends, Challenges, and Possibilities What were the highlights you found particularly meaningful?
What could have been better?
Based on this particular session, what questions remain? What topics should we go deeper into and/or what new topics should we consider covering in future SIGAP programs?
Session Feedback (2 of 9) | Session 2: Building Big: The Vision Behind the California Institute for Immunology & Immunotherapy What were the highlights you found particularly meaningful?
What could have been better?
Based on this particular session, what questions remain? What topics should we go deeper into and/or what new topics should we consider covering in future SIGAP programs?
Session Feedback (3 of 9) | Session 3: International Case Study – Architecting High Impact Gifts in Australia What were the highlights you found particularly meaningful?
What could have been better?
Based on this particular session, what questions remain? What topics should we go deeper into and/or what new topics should we consider covering in future SIGAP programs?
Session Feedback (4 of 9) | Session 4: Lunch & Keynote by Caltech President Thomas Rosenbaum What were the highlights you found particularly meaningful?
What could have been better?
Based on this particular session, what questions remain? What topics should we go deeper into and/or what new topics should we consider covering in future SIGAP programs?
Session Feedback (5 of 9) | Session 5: Managing Through Influence: The SI Framework in Practice What were the highlights you found particularly meaningful?
What could have been better?
Based on this particular session, what questions remain? What topics should we go deeper into and/or what new topics should we consider covering in future SIGAP programs?
Session Feedback (6 of 9) | Session 6: Capital as a Cornerstone: UC San Diego’s Investment in Innovation What were the highlights you found particularly meaningful?
What could have been better?
Based on this particular session, what questions remain? What topics should we go deeper into and/or what new topics should we consider covering in future SIGAP programs?
Session Feedback (7 of 9) | Session 7: SIs as Strategic Campaign Pillars: A Tale of Two Computes What were the highlights you found particularly meaningful?
What could have been better?
Based on this particular session, what questions remain? What topics should we go deeper into and/or what new topics should we consider covering in future SIGAP programs?
Session Feedback (8 of 9) | Session 8: AI in Action: Tools for Driving Strategic Initiatives What were the highlights you found particularly meaningful?
What could have been better?
Based on this particular session, what questions remain? What topics should we go deeper into and/or what new topics should we consider covering in future SIGAP programs?
Session Feedback (9 of 9) | Session 9: Broad Institute 2.0: Unlocking Big Ideas for the Future of Human Health What were the highlights you found particularly meaningful?
What could have been better?
Based on this particular session, what questions remain? What topics should we go deeper into and/or what new topics should we consider covering in future SIGAP programs?
Is there any more feedback or ideas you'd like to share?
Submit
Thank you for your feedback!
